Introduction
Welcome to a deep dive into the Steelers vs Baltimore Ravens match player stats a showdown that gave us drama, grit, and standout performances. We’ll explore every angle: from quarterbacks juggling passes and rushes to running backs weaving through defenders, defensive stops that flipped momentum, and special teams plays that left jaws on the field.
This breakdown isn’t just a highlight reel. It’s a stat-driven narrative that lets you see exactly how the game unfolded, moment by moment. You’ll walk away with a sharper lens on who shaped the outcome and what it means for both teams moving forward.
Quarterback Duel: Pickett vs. Jackson
Kenny Pickett’s Passing Breakdown
- Completions / Attempts: 23 / 35 (~65.7% completion rate)
- Passing Yards: 242
- Touchdowns (TDs): 2
- Interceptions (INTs): 1
- Passer Rating: Approx. 95.3
Pickett showed poise, especially on third downs. His third-down conversion rate stood at 40% (4 of 10), keeping drives alive when pressure rose.
Lamar Jackson’s All-Around Impact
- Passing: 18 / 27 (~66.7%), 195 yds, 1 TD, 1 INT
- Rushing: 56 yds on 9 carries (6.2 ypc), 1 rushing TD
- Overall Impact: Jackson’s dual threat made Pittsburgh’s defense adjust pre-snap and on the fly.
Third-Down Drive Wizardry
Lamar converted 5 of 11 third-downs (45%), going toe-to-toe with Pickett’s conversions. That ability to extend drives under pressure made a big difference late in the game.
Turnover Battle
- Pickett: 1 INT, no fumbles
- Jackson: 1 INT, 1 lost fumble
- Impact: Turnover margin was +1 in Pittsburgh’s favor. That pick was a turning point momentum swing central.
Ground Game Analysis
Steelers’ Running Backs
- Najee Harris: 18 carries, 84 yds (4.7 ypc), 1 TD
- Jaylen Warren: 7 carries, 36 yds (5.1 ypc)
Longest Run: Harris 23 yds.
Red Zone Rushing Success: 2-for-2, both touchdowns.
Their combo added consistency and broken-tackle yardage when needed.
Ravens’ Rushing Attack
- J.K. Dobbins: 14 carries, 52 yds (3.7 ypc), no TDs
- Lamar Jackson (rush): 9 carries, 56 yds, 1 TD
In the red zone, Baltimore rushed 1-for-2, settling for a field goal once. Their combination of planned runs and Jackson’s scramble ability kept pressure on Pittsburgh’s front seven.
Receiving Breakdown
Steelers’ Wideouts
Player | Targets | Receptions | Yards | YAC* | Drops |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
George Pickens | 7 | 5 | 68 | 42 | 1 |
Diontae Johnson | 6 | 4 | 55 | 28 | 0 |
Pat Freiermuth | 4 | 3 | 35 | 15 | 0 |
*YAC = Yards After Catch
Pickens made a big play down the seam, breaking open tight coverage. His 42 YAC showed strong hands and creative footwork post-catch.
Ravens’ Receivers
Player | Targets | Receptions | Yards | YAC | Drops |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Rashod Bateman | 6 | 4 | 60 | 20 | 0 |
Zay Flowers | 5 | 3 | 48 | 30 | 1 |
Isaiah Likely | 3 | 2 | 30 | 10 | 0 |
Bateman’s deep catch (25 yds) shifted field position in Baltimore’s favor. Flowers, elusive after the catch, gave his team spark.
Offensive Line Performance
Pass Protection Metrics
- Steelers O-line: Allowed 2 sacks, 5 QB pressures
- Ravens O-line: Allowed 3 sacks, 7 QB pressures (primarily on Jackson)
Pittsburgh’s front gave Pickett consistent clean pockets, whereas Jackson often left pocket early some by choice, others by necessity.
Run Blocking Efficiency
Steelers generated 2.5 yards before contact on 70% of runs. That opened holes at the second level.
Ravens averaged 1.8 yards before contact solid but less explosive. Their edge was Jackson’s improvisation.
Defensive Standouts
Steelers’ Defensive Leaders
- T.J. Watt: 1 sack, 2 QB pressures, 3 tackles for loss (TFL)
- Myles Jack: 8 tackles, 1 forced fumble
- Patrick Peterson: 1 INT on a deep route attempt
Watt’s pressure disrupted timing. That INT came on 2nd-and-8 midway through the 4th quarter momentum boost central to Pittsburgh’s clutch drive.
Ravens’ Defensive Strengths
- Roquan Smith: 10 tackles, 1 TFL
- Chuck Clark: 7 tackles, 1 INT
- Marlon Humphrey: 1 pass breakup, tight coverage on Johnson
Despite giving up a close win, Baltimore’s back seven held firm in late-game situations forcing Pittsburgh into field goal range, not easy TDs.
Big Momentum Plays
- Steelers: Watt’s 4th-quarter strip-sack forced short field.
- Ravens: Clark’s INT late in 3rd quarter stopped a Pittsburgh drive. Both swung momentum.
Special Teams Impact
Field Goals & Extra Points
- Steelers Kicker (Chris Boswell): 2-for-2, longest 52 yd FG.
- Ravens Kicker (Justin Tucker): 3-for-3, including 48 yd FG.
Punt & Kick Coverage
- Steelers: Allowed 6.8 yds per return.
- Ravens: Allowed 7.5 yds per return.
Neither team returned kicks for huge yardage but both contributed to field position battles throughout.
Game-Changing Moments
Steelers blocked a 3rd-quarter punt that set them up at the 15 -yard line. That led to a quick TD and was arguably the sharpest special-teams play of the night.
Advanced Team Metrics
Third-Down Efficiency
- Steelers: 8 of 17 (47%)
- Ravens: 7 of 16 (44%)
Tightly matched. But Pittsburgh’s conversions came on longer-yardage downs, which made those ones more impressive.
Red Zone Efficiency
- Steelers: 3 trips, 3 TDs (100%)
- Ravens: 3 trips, 2 TDs + 1 FG (66.7%)
That one missed TD was the field goal, giving Pittsburgh a slight edge in red-zone punch.
Time of Possession
- Steelers: 31 minutes
- Ravens: 29 minutes
A 2-minute edge, small but meaningful in late-game clock management.
Turnover Margin
Steelers +1: Jackson’s fumble and both teams had one INT each. That net turnover gave Pittsburgh short field twice, turning into seven points.
Clutch Plays & Game-Changing Drive
Steelers’ Game-Winning Drive Analysis
Pittsburgh began at their own 28 with 2:05 left.
- 1st play: Pickett to Johnson for 9 yds
- 2nd: Harris 6 yds through the right gap
- 3rd: Pickens deep over the top 32 yd gain
- 4th: Inside the 30, Pickett hit Freiermuth across middle 16 yds
- Final: Boswell nails 45-yard FG as clock winds to 0:00
That drive featured precision, smart use of timeouts, and bold play-calling.
Ravens’ Final Push
Baltimore started at their 25 with 1:30 left and one timeout.
- Attempted deep pass on 2nd down nearly picked off
- On 3rd down, incomplete slant
- Tucker’s 51-yard FG attempt missed wide right
Two quick plays without gain, and that sealed the game.
Full Player Stats Table (Steelers vs Ravens Match Player Stats)
Team | Player | Pass Yds / TD / INT | Rush Yds / TD | Rec Yds / TD | Sacks | INTs | Other Notes |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Steelers | Kenny Pickett | 242 / 2 / 1 | — | — | — | — | 65.7% comp |
Steelers | Najee Harris | — | 84 / 1 | — | — | — | 4.7 ypc |
Steelers | Jaylen Warren | — | 36 / 0 | — | — | — | 5.1 ypc |
Steelers | George Pickens | — | — | 68 / 0 | — | — | 42 YAC, 5 catches |
Steelers | T.J. Watt | — | — | — | 1 | — | 2 pressures, 3 TFL |
Steelers | Patrick Peterson | — | — | — | — | 1 | Critical INT |
Ravens | Lamar Jackson | 195 / 1 / 1 | 56 / 1 | — | — | — | Dual threat prowess |
Ravens | J.K. Dobbins | — | 52 / 0 | — | — | — | 3.7 ypc, limited red zone |
Ravens | Rashod Bateman | — | — | 60 / 0 | — | — | Deep play gave field pos. |
Ravens | Roquan Smith | — | — | — | — | — | 10 tackles, 1 TFL |
Ravens | Chuck Clark | — | — | — | — | 1 | Key INT |
Key Takeaways
- **Steelers edged the steel their ground game and red-zone efficiency sealed it.
- Pickett matured under pressure, avoiding major errors and carving the Ravens with timely throws.
- Lamar Jackson’s dual-threat kept Baltimore competitive. His rushing TD kept them in the fight.
- Pittsburgh’s special teams made a telling impact with that blocked punt and flawless kicking.
- Turnover margin and third-down plays quietly tilted the edge. Pittsburgh’s third-down conversions came on tougher situations a high-leverage advantage.
- Clutch execution was stark: Steelers turned a final drive into points; Ravens stalled despite time and field position.
These baltimore ravens vs steelers match player stats gave us not just a game, but a battle defined by discipline, smart play, and just enough highlights to lean Pittsburgh’s way.
FAQs (Steelers vs Baltimore Ravens Match Player Stats)
Who had the best individual performance?
- Likely T.J. Watt for game-changing defensive pressure and TFLs, or Najee Harris for goal-line grit. Lamar Jackson’s dual stats make a strong case too.
Which stat category made the biggest difference?
- Red-zone efficiency and turnover margin. Steelers scored on every trip inside the 20; Baltimore settled once. That’s a 4-point swing.
Did special teams play a major role?
- Yes. The blocked punt and perfect kicking gave Pittsburgh short field and automatic points swing plays in tight games.
How does this compare to past Steelers vs Ravens games?
- Typical of the rivalry: close, physical, decided by one or two decisive plays. Stats show the same pattern defensive struggle, red-zone tilt, and special-teams moments.
Final Thoughts
This wasn’t just another Steelers vs Baltimore Ravens match player stats story. It was a showcase of balanced offense, disciplined defense, and impactful plays. You saw quarterbacks managing the clock and pressure. You saw running backs grinding yardage late. You saw elite defenders shift momentum. And special-teams units tipping the field with a single swing.
All told, this game is a reminder that in AFC North showdowns, it’s rarely a blowout. Every yard, every stop, every drop-back counts. That’s why the baltimore ravens vs steelers match player stats tell such a compelling tale not of dominance, but of precision, response, and composure under fire.